Table of contents

Replacements of Cisco or other hardware-based VPNs

    Table of contents
    You are currently comparing two old versions - only when you are comparing against the latest version can you revert. Return to version archive.

    Combined revision comparison

    Comparing version 22:03, 9 Jul 2013 by yagi with version 23:47, 9 Jul 2013 by yagi.

    Other changes:

    1. /body/p/img/@style: nothing ⇒ ""

    Version from 22:03, 9 Jul 2013

    This revision modified by yagi (Ban)

    banner7_2.jpgCisco, Juniper or other hardware-based IPsec VPNs are expensive for set-up and management. They are also lack of usability and compatibility with Firewalls. Replacement of them to SoftEther VPN is very easy because SoftEther VPN also has the L2TP/IPsec VPN function which is same to Cisco's.

    Version as of 23:47, 9 Jul 2013

    This revision modified by yagi (Ban)

    banner7_2.jpgCisco, Juniper or other hardware-based IPsec VPNs are expensive for set-up and management. They are also lack of usability and compatibility with Firewalls. Replacement of them to SoftEther VPN is very easy because SoftEther VPN also has the L2TP/IPsec VPN function which is same to Cisco's.

    7_replace.jpg