3.1 Operating System Requirements

    Table of contents
    You are currently comparing two old versions - only when you are comparing against the latest version can you revert. Return to version archive.

    Combined revision comparison

    Comparing version 15:59, 2 Mar 2013 by yagi with version 17:38, 2 Mar 2013 by yagi.

    ...

    While the SoftEther VPN Server can perform sufficiently on the FreeBSD platform, there is the disadvantage of not being able to use the local bridge connection function. On the whole, using the SoftEther VPN Server on FreeBSD does not pose any problems when the user does not intend to utilize the local bridge function. The FreeBSD version SoftEther VPN Server is compatible with the following system architectures. Note that there is a high likelihood that compliant architectures will increase in the future.

    ...

     

    The VPN Server can deliver sufficient performance on the Solaris platform. Additionally, the local bridge connection function can be used on Build 5220 or later versions of the Solaris version SoftEther VPN Server / VPN Bridge. This has enabled the Solaris OS to realize VPN Server / VPN Bridge functionality comparable to that of Windows or Linux operating systems. BecauseAlso, because the Solaris OS operates on hardware using SPARC CPUs, companies possessing this special hardware can effectively utilize their resources as VPN servers by running the SoftEther VPN Server on said hardware.

    ...

     

    While the SoftEther VPN Server can perform sufficiently on the Mac OS X platform, there is the disadvantage of not being able to use the local bridge connection function. On the whole, using the SoftEther VPN Server on Mac OS X does not pose any problems when the user does not intend to utilize the local bridge function. Multithread library performance on the Mac OS X may be inferior to that of other operating systems, so we recommend using other OS when the SoftEther VPN Server is to be used in a high load environment.

    ...

    Version from 15:59, 2 Mar 2013

    This revision modified by yagi (Ban)

    ...

    While the SoftEther VPN Server can perform sufficiently on the FreeBSD platform, there is the disadvantage of not being able to use the local bridge connection function. On the whole, using the SoftEther VPN Server on FreeBSD does not pose any problems when the user does not intend to utilize the local bridge function.

    ...

    The VPN Server can deliver sufficient performance on the Solaris platform. Additionally, the local bridge connection function can be used on Build 5220 or later versions of the Solaris version SoftEther VPN Server / VPN Bridge. This has enabled the Solaris OS to realize VPN Server / VPN Bridge functionality comparable to that of Windows or Linux operating systems.

    Also, because the Solaris OS operates on hardware using SPARC CPUs, companies possessing this special hardware can effectively utilize their resources as VPN servers by running the SoftEther VPN Server on said hardware.

    ...

    While the SoftEther VPN Server can perform sufficiently on the Mac OS X platform, there is the disadvantage of not being able to use the local bridge connection function. On the whole, using the SoftEther VPN Server on Mac OS X does not pose any problems when the user does not intend to utilize the local bridge function. Multithread library performance on the Mac OS X may be inferior to that of other operating systems, so we recommend using other OS when the SoftEther VPN Server is to be used in a high load environment.

    ...

    Version as of 17:38, 2 Mar 2013

    This revision modified by yagi (Ban)

    ...

    Because the Solaris OS operates on hardware using SPARC CPUs, companies possessing this special hardware can effectively utilize their resources as VPN servers by running the SoftEther VPN Server on said hardware.

    ...